Decision proof
Site-comparison scorecard
An anonymized comparison record will be added when an approved assignment is available.
Transaction services
Tenant Representation & Site Selection
Turn operating requirements into a defensible site decision and negotiated commercial path.
Volterra helps data center users and infrastructure buyers define requirements, compare markets and sites, test power and network assumptions, coordinate diligence, and advance commercial negotiations. The process preserves a transparent decision record so the final shortlist reflects operating constraints - not simply site availability.
Use this when
- Operating requirements need to become a transparent evaluation framework.
- Sites must be compared across power, network, schedule, control, and commercial terms.
- The final shortlist must support both executive approval and negotiation.
The decision
Which location best satisfies the operating requirement at an acceptable risk and commercial structure?
What you receive
- Requirement and evaluation framework
- Market scan and qualified shortlist
- Power, network, schedule, and site comparison
- RFP, LOI, and negotiation support
- Executive recommendation and decision record
How the work moves
Illustrative decision record
The shortlist stays tied to operating requirements and explicit evidence status.
| Criterion | Site A | Site B | Site C |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power pathway | Strong | Conditional | Open |
| Schedule | Conditional | Strong | Conditional |
| Site control | Strong | Strong | Conditional |
| Network access | Strong | Conditional | Strong |
| Commercial terms | Conditional | Strong | Strong |
Proof and next step
See the standard behind the work.
Public examples are linked only where they are an honest representation of the product on this page.
Start with the decision
Define the requirement.
Bring the current evidence, the decision deadline, and the role you need Volterra to own.